Effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and both sides up ball exercise on pain level, range of motion, muscle function after total knee arthroplasty

Article information

J Exerc Rehabil Vol. 20, No. 1, 17-23, February, 2024
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 February 21
doi : https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.2448004.002
Department of Kinesiology, College of Natural Science, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea
*Corresponding author: Young-Pyo Kim, Department of Kinesiology, College of Natural Science, Jeju National University, 102 Jejudaehak-ro, Jeju 63243, Korea, Email: kimyp@jejunu.ac.kr
Received 2024 January 3; Revised 2024 January 12; Accepted 2024 January 14.

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease caused tearing and progressive wear of articular cartilage, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is recommended to patients with OA. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and both sides up ball (BOSU) exercises on pain, range of motion (ROM), and muscle function in patients following TKA. Ten participants who have limitation of the knee joint from TKA were divided into two groups: the continuous passive motion (CPM)+PNF exercise group (n=5) and the CPM+BOUS exercise group (n=5). Exercise rehabilitation program consisted of PNF and BOSU exercises, and both exercises were performed twice a day for 2 weeks. To examine effect of exercise rehabilitation, visual analogue scale (VAS), sit and reach flexibility, knee ROM, and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were measured before and after exercise intervention. A two-way repeated analysis of variance was used to confirm the main effect. If there was a significant interaction effect, an independent t-test between groups or a paired t-test between times was applied. VAS, sit and reach flexibility, knee ROM and TUG did not show interaction between the PNF and BOSU exercise groups, but all measured variables showed significant differences over time. Present findings provide information that PNF and BOSU exercise rehabilitation after TKA might be an important part of ensuring successful surgical outcomes as they have a positive impact on reducing pain, increasing ROM, improving muscle strength, and enhancing daily life movements.

INTRODUCTION

The knee joint is one of the largest and most complex joints in the human body and belongs to a synovial joint that connects the femur, tibia, and patella. The knee joint also is stabilized by surrounding skeletal muscles, tendons, and ligaments, but it is a joint with a high risk of injury in daily life or sports activities (Albtoush et al., 2018).

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease caused tearing and progressive wear of articular cartilage. Patients with OA have reduced lower limb strength and exercise performance due to pain and inflammation in the knee joint. Specifically, it has been reported that joint stiffness and deformation, and decreased proprioceptive function in OA patients decrease the patient’s balance ability, leading to a decline in quality of life (Knoop et al., 2012). To treat patients with OA, nonsurgical treatments such as drug therapy, physical therapy, exercise therapy are primarily applied. However, If the degree of joint damage is severe and extreme pain interferes with daily life, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is recommended (Canovas and Dagneaux, 2018).

Patients who undergo a TKA often experience loss of mobility due to pain at surgical site (Canovas and Dagneaux, 2018). Mobility in patients following TKA is closely associated with range of motion (ROM) of the knee. A decrease in knee ROM not only reduces lower extremity muscle strength over time, but also induces joint stiffness (Zeni and Higginson, 2009).

Rehabilitation is one of the important steps after TKA to improve mobility deficit and knee ROM (Lenssen et al., 2008). Continuous passive motion (CPM) is mainly used to prevent joint contracture, increase ROM, and reduce pain in TKA patients. As an exercise rehabilitation approach to increase ROM, CPM mode using isokinetic device is the most widely used worldwide (Yang et al., 2019).

Proprioceptive function is a kinesthetic receptor located in muscles, tendons, and joints that primarily controls the sense of movement and posture (Prochazka, 2021). Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) is a therapeutic technique that stimulates the proprioceptive sense through activating the response of neuromuscular mechanisms such as muscle spindles or tendon spindle organs (Sharman et al., 2006). Hindle et al. (2012) reported that PNF can regulate pain, muscle strength, ROM, and functional movement in people with the skeletal muscle weakness. Alaca et al. (2015) suggested that PNF technique is widely used in the treatment of not only patients with central nervous system disorders but also those with musculoskeletal issues including TKA patients.

Both sides up ball (BOSU) is an exercise equipment in the form of a hemispherical inflated ball that is flat on one side and convex on the other. Various BOSU exercises on an unstable platform can enhance balance and muscular strength at the same time (Behm and Colado, 2012). Squat exercises using BOSU have been shown to increase balance and improve muscle activity in the trunk muscles, glutes, and lower extremities (Saeterbakken et al., 2014). Furthermore, walking practice using BOSU during rehabilitation exercises for patellar pain syndrome has resulted in stable balance patterns and gait (Calatayud et al., 2017).

Previous studies on exercise rehabilitation for TKA patients have explored various PNF treatments, but research on BOSU exercise treatment remains limited. To promote mobility and physical activity in patients following TKA, a systematic exercise rehabilitation program is needed to reduce pain in the early stage of rehabilitation and improve lower extremity balance ability, ROM, muscle strength. Therefore, this study aimed to compare and analyze the effect of PNF and BOSU exercise on pain, ROM, and muscle function in TKA patients, and to present an exercise treatment program suitable for the early stage of rehabilitation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants

Participants in this study were only those who underwent 1–2 weeks after TKA surgery at Jeju Medical Center and expressed their intention to participate in this experiment. Ten elderly women participated and were randomly assigned two groups: the CPM+ PNF exercise group (n=5) and the CPM+BOUS exercise group (n=5) (Table 1). Before beginning the study, all participants had a detailed explanation of this study, and they submitted their written informed consent to the researchers. This research was conducted ethically according to international guidelines. This experiment obtained approval by the Ethics Committee of Jeju National University (2020-041).

Physical characteristics of the participants

Training program

The design of the exercise treatment program in this study was inspired by the work of Chow and Ng (2010), Lewek et al. (2001), and Verhagen et al. (2005) who reconstructed exercises rehabilitation program through tests and measurements related to the functional problems of TKA patients. To achieve the purpose of this study, exercise rehabilitation program was reorganized into PNF exercise and BOSU ball exercise to suit TKA patients. The overall exercise program is outlined in (Table 2).

Total of PNF and BOSU exercise program

PNF stretching program

The exercise rehabilitation program for the PNF-treated group consisted of 30 min of patient-tailed CPM (ARTROMOT-K1, ORMED GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) and 20 min of PNF. The hold-relax PNF technique was selected and applied twice a day for 2 weeks. And a combination of isotonic exercises and rhythmic inhibition were performed alternately once. In the first week, patient’s posture for the PNF treatment was lying down and sitting with legs spread. The hold-relax PNF technique, rhythmic stability, and isotonic exercises were performed for 10 sec each, followed by 10 sec of rest, for a total of 9 sets. In the second week, patient’s posture for the PNF treatment was lying down and sitting with knees bent. The treatment, rest times, and number of repetitions were the same as in week 1. The detailed exercise program contents of the PNF group are outlined in Table 3.

CPM and PNF exercise program

BOSU ball exercise program

The exercise rehabilitation program for the BOSU group was applied for a total of 2 weeks. In detail, CPM was tailored to the patient for 30 min, followed by 20 min of BOSU (Bosu Fitness, LLC, San Diego, CA, USA) exercises. In the first week, the BOSU exercise program consisted of isometric sitting, sitting and standing, and a static standing posture for 10 sec each, followed by a 10-sec rest, and a total of 9 sets were performed. The entire BOSU exercise treatment method was repeated twice. In the second week, the BOSU exercise program included dynamic standing, standing on one leg, and walking in place. The treatment duration, rest time, and number of repetitions were the same as in week 1. The detailed exercise program for the BOSU group is outlined in Table 4.

CPM and BOSU exercise program

Visual analogue scale

A visual analogue scale (VAS) is psychometric response scales to investigate a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, and it is widely used in clinical research to examine the intensity or frequency of pain (Paul-Dauphin et al., 1999). The VAS was a 10 cm horizontal or vertical line, and both ends were marked with no pain or the most severe pain. The subjects marked a point that matched the intensity of the pain they are currently feeling.

Sit and reach flexibility testing

To measure sit and reach flexibility, a body forward bending measuring device (SC633616, SKARO, Gunpo, Korea) was utilized. The subject sits on the box with the knee straight and the soles of both feet touching the vertical surface of the measuring device. They were then instructed to slowly bend their upper body forward and gradually push the measuring device with the middle fingers of both hands. The final position was noted at the point where the subject could no longer push further, and this value was recorded. Measurements were taken twice in total, and the maximum value (cm) was recorded.

Knee ROM testing

The knee ROM of the subject was measured by a physical therapist using universal and reliable goniometer (Baseline HiRes Plastic 360 Degree ISOM, Fabrication Enterprises, White Plains, NY, USA). The subjects lie on a bed in the supine position with their knee extended. And then the active ROM was measured by flexing the knee joint. To reduce the error between measurements, ROM test was repeated 3 times, and the average value was applied.

Muscle function testing

To evaluate lower limb muscle function, a Timed Up and Go test (TUG) was performed. This test, known as the stand-up and walk test, quickly measures walking and balance ability and is a highly reliable tool with inter- and intrarater reliability scores of r=0.98 to 0.99 (Podsiadlo and Richardson, 1991). For the measurement, the subject sits comfortably on a chair with armrests placed on a flat floor. Upon receiving a ‘start’ signal from the measurer, the subject stands up from the chair and walks as quickly as possible to a turnaround point 3 m away in the direction of the operated leg, then returns to sit down on the chair. The time required for one round-trip walk is recorded, with the test repeated a total of 2 times. The average time of these two attempts is then recorded.

Statistical analysis

PASW Statistics ver. 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to determine the effect of PNF and BOSU exercise in patients with OA. To confirm the main effect, we used a two-way repeated analysis of variance. If there was a significant interaction effect, an independent t-test between groups or a paired t-test between times was applied. All values are expressed as mean±standard deviation. P<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

PNF and BOSU exercises regulate pain sensitivity

To examine VAS scores for pain, we performed a subjective measure before and after applying PNF and BOSU exercises. As shown in Table 5, VAS score did not represent interaction effect (F=0.460, P<0.517) between groups and period, but there was a significant difference in the period within group (F=37.278, P<0.001). Both PNF (t=−5.041, P<0.007) and BOSU (t=4.025, P<0.016) exercises significantly decreased values for VAS in the posttest compared pretest.

The result for visual analogue scale (VAS)

PNF and BOSU exercises regulate flexibility

Changes of flexibility in TKA patients were investigated before and after applying exercise rehabilitation. As shown in Table 6, flexibility (sit and reach test) was not shown interaction effect (F= 1.087, P<0.328) between groups and period, however, there was a significant difference in the period within the group (F=14.579, P<0.005). PNF exercise (t=−4.009, P<0.016) significantly increased values for flexibility in the post test compared pretest.

The result for flexibility

PNF and BOSU exercises regulate knee ROM

Changes of knee ROM before and after applying PNF and BOSU exercises were investigated. As shown in Table 7, knee ROM did not represent significant difference interaction effect (F=0.289, P<0.605) between groups and period, but there was a significant difference in the period within group (F=35.017, P<0.001). Both PNF (t=−3.478, P<0.025) and BOSU (t=−7.216, P<0.002) exercises significantly increased values for knee ROM in the post test compared pretest.

The result for rang of motion of the knee (ROM)

PNF and BOSU exercise regulate muscle function

Changes of TUG before and after applying PNF and BOSU exercises were investigated. As shown in Table 8, TUG was not shown interaction effect (F=0.008, P<0.932) and between groups and period, but there was a significant difference in the period within the group (F=19.143, P<0.002). Both PNF (t=2.895, P<0.044) and BOSU (t=3.364, P<0.028) exercises significantly decreased values for TUG in the post test compared pretest.

The result for Timed Up and Go test (TUG)

DISCUSSION

TKA is currently one of the most successful orthopedic surgical procedures performed when cartilage cells are damaged due to weakened ligaments and muscles in the knee joint. This surgery involves removing the severely worn joint surface and replacing it with an artificial joint (Carr et al., 2016). In the early stages postsurgery, almost all patients suffer from extreme pain, which tends to lessen over time. Pain in the knee joint generally reduces static and dynamic postural stability, balance ability, and increases the likelihood of falling due to reduced ROM of the knee (Puolakka et al., 2010). After TKA, it is crucial to apply a systematic and effective exercise rehabilitation program to improve pain, muscular strength, ROM of the knee (Dávila Castrodad et al., 2019). Our study examined changes in VAS scores according to the PNF and BOSU exercise programs and found significant reductions in pain level in both groups after rehabilitation program. Previous studies reported that early exercise rehabilitation including passive knee ROM exercises, patellofemoral joint mobilization, incision mobility and PNF decreased pain levels in patients with OA and TKA (Bade and Stevens-Lapsley, 2011; Song et al., 2020). This indicates a positive effect in patients who underwent TKA, supporting the results of this study.

ROM test has been often used in daily life and sports field to examine the joint mobility and performance capacity (Moreno-Pérez et al., 2020). In general, ROM is highly associated with increasing age and joint pain (Kennedy et al., 2013). In this study, flexibility (sit and reach) was improved in the PNF group posttest compared to pretest. Furthermore, both PNF and BOSU exercises significantly increased knee ROM after compared to before applying exercise rehabilitation program. The results suggest that the PNF and BOSU exercise programs improved flexibility by recovering knee stiffness and limited knee ROM in TKA patients. Immediately after surgery, TKA patients have complained of difficulty in undergoing exercise rehabilitation due to extreme pain, stiffness, and strong muscle contraction (MacDonald et al., 2000). Several previous studies reported that applying PNF to adults and athletes might improve ROM and flexibility function (Maicki et al., 2017; Smedes et al., 2016) as well as that exercise rehabilitation for TKA patients might stimulate proprioceptors within muscles and joints to restore ROM (Alaca et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2021). The application of various exercise rehabilitation is believed to have a positive effect on recovering ROM and flexibility function. Therefore, it is considered that TKR patients need diversity in their exercise rehabilitation programs, including both PNF and BOSU.

Increased quadriceps muscle strength is associated with functional stability of the knee joint, quality of life, and exercise performance. In addition, it has been reported that, in patients with ROM limitation such as TKA, the increase in quadriceps muscle strength at the initial stage of rehabilitation is one of the important factors determining the success of rehabilitation (Greene and Schurman, 2008; Paravlic et al., 2020). The results of these previous studies support the importance of PNF and BOSU in therapeutic strategy for developing the knee ROM.

Balance is the ability to maintain equilibrium with body’s center of gravity on various surface, and it is an essential physical capacity for static and dynamic stability of the body. To maintain functional balance, we must develop proprioception, integrated control of the central and peripheral nervous system, and vestibular sensory function (Lord and Fitzpatrick, 2001). TUG test, designed by Podsiadlo and Richardson (1991) has been used to evaluate walking ability, balance, and functional movement of older adults who had high risk of falling. Recently, it has also been applied to patients with stroke, Parkinson disease, and arthritis (Morris et al., 2001). In this study, the PNF and BOSU exercise programs resulted in faster TUG walking speeds. Previous studies by Saeterbakken et al. (2014) suggested that BOSU exercise improved lower extremity stability by enhancing muscle activation and balance ability. Also, when PNF exercise was administered to TKA patients, TUG times were significantly reduced (Blasco et al., 2017), and balance exercises notably improved mobility-related functions (Liao et al., 2015). The PNF and BOSU exercise programs are effective not only for TKA patients but also for the elderly and patients with stroke, Parkinson disease, and other conditions. Therefore, the PNF and BOSU exercise programs may be considered effective for improving walking ability in TKA patients.

Exercise rehabilitation after TKA is a crucial part of ensuring successful surgical outcomes, and this application have a positive impact on reducing pain, increasing ROM, improving muscle strength, and enhancing daily life movements. The number of TKA patients among elderly women is gradually increasing. Nevertheless, in this study, a small number of elderly participants provided consent for the exercise program. Due to the limited sample size, there are significant constraints in generalizing the results. Therefore, additional verification with larger samples will be necessary in the future.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the 2022 scientific promotion program funded by Jeju National University.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

Alaca, N., Atalay, A., & Güven, Z. Comparison of the long-term effectiveness of progressive neuromuscular facilitation and continuous passive motion therapies after total knee arthroplasty. J Phys Ther Sci, (2015). 27, 3377–3380.
Albtoush, O.M., Taib, A.A., Horger, M., & Springer, F. Avulsion fracture of an ossified pes anserinus tendon post-lateral patellar dislocation. Skeletal Radiol, (2018). 47, 699–702.
Bade, M.J., & Stevens-Lapsley, J.E. Early high-intensity rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty improves outcomes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, (2011). 41, 932–941.
Behm, D., & Colado, J.C. The effectiveness of resistance training using unstable surfaces and devices for rehabilitation. Int J Sports Phys Ther, (2012). 7, 226–241.
Blasco, J.M., Igual-Camacho, C., & Roig-Casasús, S. In-home versus hospital preoperative balance and proprioceptive training in patients undergoing TKR; rationale, design, and method of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, (2017). 18, 518.
Calatayud, J., Casaña, J., Ezzatvar, Y., Jakobsen, M.D., Sundstrup, E., & Andersen, L.L. High-intensity preoperative training improves physical and functional recovery in the early post-operative periods after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, (2017). 25, 2864–2872.
Canovas, F., & Dagneaux, L. Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, (2018). 104, (1S)S41–S46.
Carr, J.B., Werner, B.C., & Browne, J.A. Trends and outcomes in the treatment of failed septic total knee arthroplasty: comparing arthrodesis and above-knee amputation. J Arthroplasty, (2016). 31, 1574–1577.
Chow, T.P., & Ng, G.Y. Active, passive and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching are comparable in improving the knee flexion range in people with total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil, (2010). 24, 911–918.
Dávila Castrodad, I.M., Recai, T.M., Abraham, M.M., Etcheson, J.I., Mohamed, N.S., Edalatpour, A., & Delanois, R.E. Rehabilitation protocols following total knee arthroplasty: a review of study designs and outcome measures. Ann Transl Med, (2019). 7, (Suppl 7)S255.
Greene, K.A., & Schurman, J.R. Quadriceps muscle function in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, (2008). 23, (7 Suppl)15–19.
Hindle, K.B., Whitcomb, T.J., Briggs, W.O., & Hong, J. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF): its mechanisms and effects on range of motion and muscular function. J Hum Kinet, (2012). 31, 105–113.
Kennedy, J.W., Johnston, L., Cochrane, L., & Boscainos, P.J. Total knee arthroplasty in the elderly: does age affect pain, function or complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res, (2013). 471, 1964–1969.
Knoop, J., van der Leeden, M., van der Esch, M., Thorstensson, C.A., Gerritsen, M., Voorneman, R.E., Lems, W.F., Roorda, L.D., Dekker, J., & Steultjens, M.P.M. Association of lower muscle strength with self-reported knee instability in osteoarthritis of the knee: results from the Amsterdam Osteoarthritis cohort. Arthritis Care Res, (2012). 64, 38–45.
Lenssen, T.A., van Steyn, M.J., Crijns, Y.H., Waltjé, E.M., Roox, G.M., Geesink, R.J., van den Brandt, P.A., & De Bie, R.A. Effectiveness of prolonged use of continuous passive motion (CPM), as an adjunct to physiotherapy, after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, (2008). 9, 60.
Lewek, M., Stevens, J., & Snyder-Mackler, L. The use of electrical stimulation to increase quadriceps femoris muscle force in an elderly patient following a total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther, (2001). 81, 1565–1571.
Liao, C.D., Lin, L.F., Huang, Y.C., Huang, S.W., Chou, L.C., & Liou, T.H. Functional outcomes of outpatient balance training following total knee replacement in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil, (2015). 29, 855–867.
Lord, S.R., & Fitzpatrick, R.C. Choice stepping reaction time: a composite measure of falls risk in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, (2001). 56, M627–632.
MacDonald, S.J., Bourne, R.B., Rorabeck, C.H., McCalden, R.W., Kramer, J., & Vaz, M. Prospective randomized clinical trial of continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (2000). 380, 30–35.
Maicki, T., Bilski, J., Szczygieł, E., & Trąbka, R. PNF and manual therapy treatment results of patients with cervical spine osteoarthritis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, (2017). 30, 1095–1101.
Moreno-Pérez, V., Soler, A., Ansa, A., López-Samanes, Á, Madruga-Parera, M., Beato, M., & Romero-Rodríguez, D. Acute and chronic effects of competition on ankle dorsiflexion ROM in professional football players. Eur J Sport Sci, (2020). 20, 51–60.
Morris, S., Morris, M.E., & Iansek, R. Reliability of measurements obtained with the Timed “Up & Go” test in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther, (2001). 81, 810–818.
Paravlic, A.H., Kovač, S., Pisot, R., & Marusic, U. Neurostructural correlates of strength decrease following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Bosn J Basic Med Sci, (2020). 20, 1–12.
Paul-Dauphin, A., Guillemin, F., Virion, J.M., & Briançon, S. Bias and precision in visual analogue scales: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Epidemiol, (1999). 150, 1117–1127.
Podsiadlo, D., & Richardson, S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc, (1991). 39, 142–148.
Prochazka, A. Proprioception: clinical relevance and neurophysiology. Curr Opin Physiol, (2021). 23, 100440.
Puolakka, P.A., Rorarius, M.G., Roviola, M., Puolakka, T.J., Nordhausen, K., & Lindgren, L. Persistent pain following knee arthroplasty. Eur J Anaesthesiol, (2010). 27, 455–460.
Saeterbakken, A.H., Andersen, V., Jansson, J., Kvellestad, A.C., & Fimland, M.S. Effects of BOSU ball(s) during sit-ups with body weight and added resistance on core muscle activation. J Strength Cond Res, (2014). 28, 3515–3522.
Sharman, M.J., Cresswell, A.G., & Riek, S. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching: mechanisms and clinical implications. Sports Med, (2006). 36, 929–939.
Smedes, F., Heidmann, M., Schäfer, C., Fischer, N., & Stępień, A. The proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation-concept; the state of the evidence, a narrative review. Phys Ther Rev, (2016). 21, 17–31.
Song, Q., Shen, P., Mao, M., Sun, W., Zhang, C., & Li, L. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation improves pain and descending mechanics among elderly with knee osteoarthritis. Scand J Med Sci Sports, (2020). 30, 1655–1663.
Verhagen, E., Bobbert, M., Inklaar, M., van Kalken, M., van der Beek, A., Bouter, L., & van Mechelen, W. The effect of a balance training programme on centre of pressure excursion in one-leg stance. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), (2005). 20, 1094–1100.
Yang, S.S., Seo, T.B., & Kim, Y.P. Effect of aqua walking exercise on knee joint angles, muscular strength, and visual analogue scale for patients with limited range of motion of the knee. J Exerc Rehabil, (2021). 17, 265–269.
Yang, X., Li, G.H., Wang, H.J., & Wang, C.Y. Continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of associated effects on clinical outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, (2019). 100, 1763–1778.
Zeni, J.A., & Higginson, J.S. Dynamic knee joint stiffness in subjects with a progressive increase in severity of knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), (2009). 24, 366–371.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Physical characteristics of the participants

Variable PNF (n=5) BOSU (n=5)
Age (yr) 75.00±6.08 73.00±4.47
Height (cm) 151.40±8.50 151.80±2.58
Weight (kg) 56.50±7.26 61.46±9.67
BMI (kg/m2) 24.74±3.55 26.61±3.69

Values are presented mean±standard deviation.

PNF, continuous passive motion & proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation group; BOSU, continuous passive motion & both side up ball group; BMI, body mass index.

Table 2

Total of PNF and BOSU exercise program

Construction Type of training Time Intensity Frequency
Warm up Stretching exercise 5 Min ROM of painless, RPE 11–13 3 Days/wk

Main exercise CPM CPM 30 Min
PNF BOSU 20 Min

Cool down Stretching exercise 5 Min

PNF, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation; BOSU, both side up; CPM, continuous passive motion; ROM, range of motion; RPE, ratings of perceived exertion.

Table 3

CPM and PNF exercise program

Type Process Position Training Technique Time Rest Rep Set Set rest
CPM 1–2 Weeks Supine Slowly increase ROM without pain 30 Min - - - -

PNF 1 Week Supine Assisted knee flexion with a strap HR 10 Sec 10 Sec 9 Rep 2 Set 2 Min
Long sitting Knee extension on a towel roll RI, CI
Long sitting Knee flexion by sliding foot on bed HR
2 Weeks Hook lying Assisted knee extension with strap around the foot HR
Sitting Knee extension RI, CI
Sitting Knee flexion by sliding foot on the floor HR

CPM, continuous passive motion; PNF, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation; ROM, range of motion; HR, hold-relax; RI, rhythmic inhibition; CI, combination of isotonic.

Table 4

CPM and BOSU exercise program

Type Process Position Training Time Rest Rep Set Set rest
CPM 1–2 Weeks Supine Slowly increase ROM without pain 30 Min - - - -

BOSU 1 Week Sitting Sit and stretch your arms toward the sore side with your hands clasped 10 Sec 10 Sec 9 Rep 2 Set 2 Min
Sit to stand Sit Up & Stand Up
Static standing Static standing
2 Weeks Dynamic standing Dynamic standing
  • - Weight movement back and forth, left, and right in a standing position

One leg standing One leg standing
  • - Keep your eyes open and standing

Walking on BOSU Walking on BOSU

CPM, continuous passive motion; BOSU, both side up; ROM, range of motion.

Table 5

The result for visual analogue scale (VAS)

Variable Group Pre Post P-value
VAS PNF 6.8±0.5 3.2±1.6** G: 0.562
BOSU 6.9±1.3 2.4±1.6* P: 0.001
G×P: 0.517

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

PNF, continuous passive motion & proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation group; BOSU, continuous passive motion & both side up ball group; G, group; P, period; G×P, group×period.

*

P<0.05 and

**

P<0.01, significantly different from pretest.

Table 6

The result for flexibility

Variable Group Pre Post P-value
Flexibility PNF 17.9±5.4 22.8±5.8* G: 0.194
BOSU 10.7±5.8 19.1±8.9 P: 0.005
G×P: 0.328

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

PNF, Continuous passive motion & proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation group; BOSU, Continuous passive motion & both side up ball group; G, group; P, period; G×P, group×period.

*

P<0.05, significantly different from pretest.

Table 7

The result for rang of motion of the knee (ROM)

Variable Group Pre Post P-value
ROM PNF 76.0±11.9 108.4±12.9* G: 0.898
BOSU 78.0±12.5 105.0±7.9** P: 0.001
G×P: 0.605

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

PNF, continuous passive motion & proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation group; BOSU, continuous passive motion & both side up ball group; G, group; P, period; G×P, group×period.

*

P<0.05 and

**

P<0.01, significantly different from pretest.

Table 8

The result for Timed Up and Go test (TUG)

Variable Group Pre Post P-value
TUG PNF 76.0±11.9 108.4±12.9* G: 0.858
BOSU 78.0±12.5 105.0±7.9* P: 0.002
G×P: 0.932

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

PNF, Continuous passive motion & proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation group; BOSU, Continuous passive motion & both side up ball group; G, group; P, period; G×P, group×period.

*

P<0.05, significantly different from pretest.